Skip to main content

:

Follow @CompassforSbc

Search form

  • About
    • Ask a Question
  • Trending Topics
    • Trending Topics by Subject
  • How To Guides
    • All How to Guides
  • Spotlights
    • Spotlights by Subject
    • Spotlights by Country
      • Benin
      • Egypt
      • Guatemala
      • Ghana
      • India
      • Kenya
      • Malawi
      • Malawi
      • Mozambique
      • Nepal
      • Nigeria
      • Pakistan #1
      • Pakistan #2
      • Pakistan #3
      • South Africa #1
      • South Africa #2
      • Tanzania #1
      • Tanzania #2
      • Uganda
      • Ukraine
      • Viet Nam
  • COVID-19
    • COVID-19 Communication Network
    • COVID-19 Special Topics
    • Countries
    • For SBC Professionals
    • For the Public
    • Messaging Guide
    • READY Initiative
    • Songs, PSAs, Videos
    • Technical Briefs
  • MULTI-SBC
    • About
    • Search
  • Country Focus
    • Cote d'Ivoire
    • Ethiopia
    • Ghana
    • Malawi
    • Mali
    • Nepal
    • Nigeria
    • Pakistan
    • Tanzania
    • Uganda
    • Zambia
  • Contribute
  • Home
  • Collections
  • Trending Topics
  • Low-Cost Monitoring and Evaluation

Low-Cost Monitoring and Evaluation

The development community often strongly focuses on results, which monitoring and evaluation (M&E) processes can confirm and support. However, effective M&E processes may be expensive and resource heavy. They do not have to be.

M&E is important for at least two audiences: the funder and the program team. Social and behavior change (SBC) programs must often fulfill donor evaluation requirements to provide evidence of effective use of funds. Programs also want to see those results for their own programming purposes to understand both what works and where shifts should be made.

In some settings, an in-house M&E team is not a viable option, and programs may have few funds available for hiring external firms or consultants. However, programs still need to be responsive to data and show impact. SBC programs must be able to identify and use low-cost M&E alternatives to meet those needs.

To this end, we have compiled a list of resources and project examples on conducting M&E at low-cost. We invite our users to add their own resources to the Compass.


Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay 

Resources

  • Tools
  • Examples

A Guide to Participatory Monitoring of Behavior Change Communication for HIV/AIDS

This guide helps key staff and community volunteers assess and improve their efforts to abate HIV/AIDS.

View Resource

A Step by Step Guide to Monitoring and Evaluation

This resource hrlpd groups working on community led approaches to climate change and energy conduct their own M&E.

View Resource

Are Messaging Apps and Emoji-Driven M&E a Game-Changing Innovation?

This article discusses the use of smartphones for M&E. As the cost of smartphones drops, and as the growth of messaging apps like WhatsApp continues to  increase worldwide, the range of possibilities for phone-based M&E is becoming both more diverse and more complex.

View Resource

Evaluation Costing

This article explains that evaluation expenses are highly situational with no simple way to calculate costs. It offers several steps involved in costing a program's evaluation.

View Resource

Rigorous Program Evaluations on a Budget

This paper illustrates the feasibility and value of low-cost randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for policy officials and researchers, by providing concrete examples from diverse program areas.

View Resource

The Echo Platform

The Echo cloud-based platform provides a way of monitoring projects that requires no information technology or programming skills to use.

View Resource

Agencies Need to Get Savvy about Low-cost Program Evaluation

This resource discusses how SBC programs usually plan for M&E from the very first planning steps, but that depending on the funding, M&E budgets can at times be limited. Planners must figure out how to evaluate the program on a limited budget.

View Resource

Informing Social and Behavior Change Programs Using Social Listening and Social Monitoring

This brief offers practical guidance on how to use social listening as a tool to inform SBC programs. It is intended for global and regional SBC program implementers, evaluators, and donors in USAID priority countries.

View Resource

IndiKit

IndiKit was developed by the Czech INGO People in Need (PIN). It aims to make M&E of relief and development interventions easier and better by helping humanitarian and development workers to use well-formulated project indicators. It also helps them to orrectly collect and analyze the data required for each indicator.

View Resource

Lessons for Health Program Monitoring and Evaluation in a Low Resource Setting

Numerous guidelines outline best practices for health program M&E. However, health programs are often implemented in less-than-ideal circumstances where these best practices may not be resourced or feasible.

View Resource

Budget Friendly M&E: Five Survival Tips for Reporting in Tough Economic Times

 When program budgets are tightened, M&E can be the first place to face cuts. 

View Resource

Evaluation on a Shoestring Budget

This brief states that M&E does not have to be time-consuming or expensive to be worthwhile, but it does require some resources to plan it, collect information, and use the results to strengthen your program. It will guide programs in making the most of a limited budget.

View Resource

Evaluation in a Low-Resource Setting: Strategies for Success

Program evaluations in a LRS can be challenging in that the program staff may not have the skills or capacity to see it through. However, agencies often require formal evaluation of their funded programs which may lead to the hiring of a contract evaluator.

View Resource

Contact Tracing by Community Health Workers in Low-Resource, Non-US Settings

This document provides information on how community health workers (CHWs) can support contact tracing efforts related to COVID-19 in low resource and resource-limited non-U.S. settings. The considerations provided can be adapted to follow national or local guidelines and account for local context.

View Resource

Community-Led Monitoring

Community-led monitoring (CLM) is a technique initiated and implemented by local community-based organizations and other civil society groups, networks of key populations (KP), people living with HIV (PLHIV), and other affected groups, or other community entities that gather quantitative and qualitative data about HIV services.

View Resource

Messages for Interactive Voice Response, Nigeria

Nigeria

Breakthrough ACTION-Nigeria managers sent reminder messages to people who received referrals for health services (e.g., antenatal care, immunization, malaria testing). 

Download

Project m-Maitri: Interactive Voice Response (IVR) for Parent-to-Child Transmission

India

In 2016, Solidarity and Action Against the HIV Infection in India began a partnership with Janssen Global Public Health, an initiative of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. The initiative, named m-Maitri, aimed to complement on-the-ground efforts at ensuring retention in the prevention of parent-to-child transmission cascade with interactive voice response (IVR) to consenting pregnant women and mother-baby pairs until the babies reach 18 months of age.

View Resource

The Use of IVR to Support Monitoring and Evaluation of Media Interventions: A Case Study of the VOTO System in Rwanda

Rwanda
In this report the authors explore the potential that IVR systems have as both a distribution and an M&E tool, noting the limitations the current state of IVR technology imposes. 
Download
View Resource

Data on a Dime: Designing an Effective Monitoring & Evaluation Strategy on a Budget

Uganda

The Safe Mothers, Safe Babies  ia  maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) program in Uganda.

View Resource

How the Echo Platform Helped Drive and Monitor Behavior Change amongst Low-income Teenage Girls

Kenya

Kenyan girls miss four days of school every month, often due to pain connected to their menstrual cycle, lack of sanitary products and lack of knowledge about their period. This problem is acute in low-income settlements, where sanitary products are costly and hard to find, school facilities are inadequate, and health education is poor.

View Resource
Grace Awantang
Dominick Shattuck

This website is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Breakthrough-ACTION Project, supported by USAID’s Office of Population and Reproductive Health, Bureau for Global Health, under Cooperative Agreement #AID-OAA-A-17-00017 with the Johns Hopkins University.

Breakthrough-ACTION is based at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Communication Programs (JHU∙CCP). The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of JHU∙CCP. The information provided on this website is not official U.S. Government information and does not necessarily represent the views or positions of USAID, the United States Government, or The Johns Hopkins University.

Ask a question